MMsun2.gif
Cost savings
from energy efficiency
and solar strategies

    When solar energy collecting devices are integrated into the south facing wall and roof of a builing and are coupled with passive solar design strategies, solar energy becomes an economic alternative to centralized power generation. Quickest payback comes from conservation and energy efficent design, followed by savings through the use of solar heated water and solar driven hydronic heating, and, finally, integrated photovoltaics. However, even if a building is designed and constructed with the least environmental impact in mind, when it comes to air pollution the automobile remains the real culprit. In a rural area, transportation uses twice the energy used in housing but causes about 7 times the air pollution because of its total reliance on petroleum. An electric car recharged by an integrated PV array can have the most positive effect on air quality. Taken in isolation each of these direct solar strategies would have marginal success, but used in conjunction the environmental quality and economic savings compound. The following is an economic analysis based on real functioning examples. The cost savings are based on a 30 year life span of most solar hardware and compared to the local utility's estimated energy costs for an average home.

Conservation and energy efficient design
    Simple conservation measures mean financial savings. A switch from incandescent to fluorescent light bulbs can save $5 to $15 a month (at 12.5 cents/kwh). Natural lighting can save another $20 a month. Using a clothesline instead of an electric dryer for the sunny half of the year can save $15 per month. Purchasing an energy efficient refrigerator can save up to $18 a month. A front load clothes washer can save $6 per month over the standard top loader. A well-insulated building with full southern exposure and well-placed thermal mass to store direct gain, can save $70/mth of the energy needed during the heating season. Natural ventilation instead of air conditioning during the summer months can save $50 a month during the cooling season. The savings from conservation measures minus their initial purchase and installation cost amount to $18,000 over a 30 year period.

Solar hot water
    An electric water heater can account for $50 per month on the utility bill. Simple solar hot water heaters can be installed for as little as $1,000. In most cases a convection or thermal siphon system - which requires no pumps or energy - can be used to satisfy domestic hot water needs. Backup during sunless periods is provided by the addition of coils in a wood stove or an auxiliary gas heater. The savings from a solar hot water system minus the initial installation and hardware cost is over $10,000 for a 30 year period.

Solar driven hydronic heating
    The south-facing walls of an energy conscious home are the best place for controlled solar gain because they receive more energy in the winter than they do in the summer. Solar gain in the summer can be totally avoided with the addition of overhangs. Flat plate collectors can take the place of siding on the south wall, along with windows, which provide direct solar gain. The collectors heat liquid which is circulated through radiant heating pipes embedded in the floor. This type of solar driven hydronic heating coupled with direct gain and good insulation can save another 30% on the space heating. This compares to a monthly utility bill of $200 for an electrically heated average sized home, and $100 for gas. The collectors end up being less expensive to purchase and install than the furnace that would normally drive the hydronic heating system. Assuming the average heating season is five months, up to $1,000 can be saved per year and $30,000 over the 30 year life expectancy of high quality flat plate collectors and radiant floor.

Integrated Photovoltaics
    Typically a roof's main function is to keep the rain out while maintaining a comfortable indoor temperature. When a photovoltaic material is used as the roofing material, the roof takes on a dual function by converting the sun's rays into electricity. If the photovoltaics are 10% efficient about 400 sq ft. of roofing area will satisfy the electrical needs of an average energy efficient home.

IntegratedPV.jpg
a new home with integrated Uni-Solartm PV roof

    Crystalline, poly-crystalline, and amorphous are the commonly available kinds of photovoltaics. Crystalline and poly-crystalline are about 14 to 18% efficient in their conversion of sunlight into energy compared with 4 to 10% efficiency for amorphous panels. However, the overall efficiency of thin film amorphous silicone panels, when compared to stationary crystalline panels, is increased by their ability to convert indirect or diffused light. This makes the amorphous panels very useful in areas with extended periods of overcast skies.
    Another advantage is their environmentally friendly manufacture. The thin film is applied without any waste, while significant material loss results in the manufacture of crystalline panels. The energy consumed in the manufacture of thin film amorphous panels is recuperated in as little as two months of use, as opposed to up to 5 years to produce the energy used to manufacture crystalline panels. Because the thin film amorphous material adheres to materials that also make good roofing, like metal, glass and ceramic, it becomes versatile as a building material. Uni-Solartm, United Solar Systems Corp, with its corporate headquarters in Troy, MI., is laminating thin film amorphous material to standing seam metal roofing that could revolutionize home construction. The 20 foot long standing seam metal roof panels produce 800 watts per 100 sq ft.

    The total income generated by 30 years of living in an efficient solar home is $75,000.

    The industrialized world spends more money on transportation than on housing. It costs the nation $95 billion a year to treat air quality related health problems, according to the American Lung Association. Transportation's total reliance on petroleum causes 80% of that air pollution. When alternative fuels, such as wind, solar and hydro, are used to recharge electric vehicles the need for petroleum use is eliminated.

the solution comes up every morning Steve Heckeroth
Homestead Enterprises: Solar Design and Renewable Energy Products
Box 151
Albion, CA 95410
phone/FAX 707-937-0338     EMail Us!
    solar@renewables.com

Home    Solar Design    Passive Solar    Solar Access Charging   


a little space...
this page generated with 100% recycled electrons!
updated 2January98 12:20 Caspar (Pacific) Time
Michael Potts, webster
([an error occurred while processing this directive])